Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831161›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Multisensory processing impacts memory for objects and their sources.

Shea E Duarte, Andrew P Yonelinas, Simona Ghetti, Joy J Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multisensory coding of audiovisual movies in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Your Body as a Tool to Learn Second Language Vocabulary.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shea E DuarteDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. seduarte@ucdavis.edu.
Andrew P YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Simona GhettiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Joy J GengDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Funding

Learning, Memory, and Plasticity (LaMP) Training ProgramT32MH112507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Karen Zito · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
Plasticity, Perception, and the Medial Temporal LobesR01EY025999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YONELINAS, ANDREW P · 2016 to 2022
$2.3M
Quantifying the attentional templateR01MH113855 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GENG, JOY JIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Identifying mechanisms of multisensory memory using virtual reality and fMRIF31MH133270 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DUARTE, SHEA · 2023 to 2025
$82k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025999NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH133270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113855NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory object processing improves recognition memory for individual objects, but its impact on memory for neighboring visual objects and scene context remains largely unknown. It is therefore unclear how multisensory processing impacts episodic memory for information outside of the object itself. We conducted three experiments to test the prediction that the presence of audiovisual objects at encoding would improve memory for nearby visual objects, and improve memory for the environmental context in which they occurred. In Experiments 1a and 1b, participants viewed audiovisual-visual object pairs or visual-visual object pairs with a control sound during encoding and were subsequently tested on their memory for each object individually. In Experiment 2, objects were paired with semantically congruent or meaningless control sounds and appeared within four different scene environments. Memory for the environment was tested. Results from Experiments 1a and 1b showed that encoding a congruent audiovisual object did not significantly benefit memory for neighboring visual objects, but Experiment 2 showed that encoding a congruent audiovisual object did improve memory for the environments in which those objects were encoded. These findings suggest that multisensory processing can influence memory beyond the objects themselves and that it has a unique role in episodic memory formation. This is particularly important for understanding how memories and associations are formed in real-world situations, in which objects and their surroundings are often multimodal.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMemory, EpisodicPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAudiovisual processingMultisensory memoryRecognitionSource memory

Identifiers

PMID38831161
PMCPMC11868352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.