Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831134›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Validity and reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Xavier Ruiz-Tarrazo, Carles Escalona-Marfil, Gil Pla-Campas, Andrea Coda

Abstract readSystematic ReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xavier Ruiz-TarrazoFaculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Av. Universitària, 4-6, 08242, Manresa, Spain. xruiz@umanresa.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-3879
Carles Escalona-MarfilFaculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Av. Universitària, 4-6, 08242, Manresa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-9557
Gil Pla-CampasFaculty of Education, Translation, Sport and Psychology at Vic, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), C/ Sagrada Família 7, 080500, Vic, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-6401
Andrea CodaPodiatry, School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing - The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-6672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Torsional disorders of the lower limb are common in childhood, and they are one of the primary reasons parents seek consultation with healthcare providers. While clinical manoeuvres can assess femoral and tibial torsion, their reliability is medium to low. Various imaging-based techniques, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, fluoroscopy, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography, have been used to evaluate torsional alterations of the lower extremity. Among these, ultrasound assessment offers certain advantages: it is a low-cost, non-irradiating technique, which allows the follow-up of children's torsional development. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, its validity and reliability have not been summarised in a systematic review. This study aims to analyse the validity and reliability of ultrasonography in determining femoral and tibial torsion in children and adolescents. A search from Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL databases were performed from inception to 16 March 2023. No restrictions were placed on the publication year or language. The methodological quality of all eligible studies was independently reviewed by two authors using QUADAS and STARD checklists. Overall, 1546 articles were identified through the searches; 30 were considered eligible for full-text screening; and 8 studies were finally included in this review. The included studies were conducted in Germany, Norway and the UK. Among them, 7 studies analysed the validity of ultrasonography compared with other imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar X-ray, and 4 studies assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability. All the studies assessed femoral torsion, but only one of them also included tibial torsion.     Conclusion: Ultrasound is a good alternative for routine evaluation and follow-up of femoral torsional alterations in children and adolescents due to its safety, accessibility and immediate results in the clinical examination room. Although ultrasound has good accuracy and reliability for routine evaluations, there is controversy about whether it is sufficient for surgical planning. In cases where greater accuracy is required, magnetic resonance imaging and biplanar radiography are the preferred imaging techniques. What is Known: • Several imaging-based techniques have been described for the assessment of torsional alterations of the lower extremity. • Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, biplanar radiology and ultrasonography are the most used and studied methods. What is New: • Ultrasonography represents a good alternative for the assessment of femoral and tibial torsional alterations in children and adolescents, given its safety, accessibility and immediacy of results in the consultation room. • Its accuracy and reliability are good but not sufficient for surgical planning, in which case MRI and biplanar X-ray will be the preferred choices.

Indexed as

FemurTibiaTorsion AbnormalityUltrasonographyAdolescentChildHumansReproducibility of ResultsChildrenEchographyFemoral antetorsionFemoral anteversionTibial torsionUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38831134
PMCPMC11263233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.