ArticleScientific reports2024
Linear matrix genetic programming as a tool for data-driven black-box control-oriented modeling in conditions of limited access to training data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the paper, a new evolutionary technique called Linear Matrix Genetic Programming (LMGP) is proposed. It is a matrix extension of Linear Genetic Programming and its application is data-driven black-box control-oriented modeling in conditions of limited access to training data. In LMGP, the model is in the form of an evolutionarily-shaped program which is a sequence of matrix operations. Since the program has a hidden state, running it for a sequence of input data has a similar effect to using well-known recurrent neural networks such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) or Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). To verify the effectiveness of the LMGP, it was compared with different types of neural networks. The task of all the compared techniques was to reproduce the behavior of a nonlinear model of an underwater vehicle. The results of the comparative tests are reported in the paper and they show that the LMGP can quickly find an effective and very simple solution to the given problem. Moreover, a detailed comparison of models, generated by LMGP and LSTM/GRU, revealed that the former are up to four times more accurate than the latter in reproducing vehicle behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.