Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831065›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Immediate SVF-Gel Injection Reduced Incision Scar Formation: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Self-control Trial.

Xiangke Rong, Jiezhang Tang, Jizhong Yang, Kai Wang, Juanli Dang, Zhou Yu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Chenggang Yi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiangke RongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jiezhang TangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jizhong YangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Juanli DangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhou YuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhaoxiang ZhangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Chenggang YiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. yichg@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-0872

Funding

Military Logistics Scientific Research Program of China BKJ18J003National Natural Science Foundation of China 51973172Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province 2019TD-020Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province No. 2020JC-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin incision scars are cosmetically displeasing; the effects of current treatments are limited, and new methods to reduce scar formation need to be found.

objectiveWe sought to determine whether immediate postoperative injection of stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) could reduce scar formation at skin incision sites.

methodsA prospective, randomized, double-blind, self-controlled trial was conducted in patients who underwent breast reduction. SVF-gel was intradermally injected into the surgical incision on one randomly selected side, with the other side receiving saline as a control. At the 6-month follow-up, the incision scars were evaluated using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Antera 3D camera was used for objective evaluation.

resultsThe VSS score and VAS score were significantly different between the SVF-gel-treated side (3.80 ± 1.37, 3.37±1.25) and the control side (5.25 ± 1.18, 4.94 ± 1.28). Moreover, the SVF-gel-treated side showed statistically significant improvements in scar appearance, based on evidences from Antera 3D camera. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center, single-race, and single-gender study. Furthermore, the results were available only for the 6-month interim follow-up period.

conclusionPostoperative immediate SVF-gel injection in surgical incisions can reduce scar formation, and exert a preventive effect on scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

CicatrixMammaplastyStromal Vascular FractionSurgical WoundAdultDouble-Blind MethodEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGelsHumansInjections, IntradermalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeGelsAntera 3D cameraCosmeticScarsSkin incisionSVF-gelVancouver scar scaleVisual analogic scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.