Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38830899›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

Long-term trial of protection provided by adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the PPRV H protein.

Karin E Darpel, Amanda Corla, Anna Stedman, Fiona Bellamy, John Flannery, Paulina Rajko-Nenow, Claire Powers, Steve Wilson, Bryan Charleston, Michael D Baron and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karin E DarpelThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Amanda CorlaThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Anna StedmanThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6751-6496
Fiona BellamyAPHA, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, Weybridge, UK.
John FlanneryThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Paulina Rajko-NenowThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-1648
Claire PowersViral Vector Core Facility, Pandemic Sciences Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Steve WilsonGlobal Alliance for Livestock Veterinary Medicines, Edinburgh, UK.
Bryan CharlestonThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Michael D BaronThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK.
Carrie BattenThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK. carrie.batten@pirbright.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-7375

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recombinant, replication-defective, adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the H surface glycoprotein of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) has previously been shown to protect goats from challenge with wild-type PPRV at up to 4 months post vaccination. Here, we present the results of a longer-term trial of the protection provided by such a vaccine, challenging animals at 6, 9, 12 and 15 months post vaccination. Vaccinated animals developed high levels of anti-PPRV H protein antibodies, which were virus-neutralising, and the level of these antibodies was maintained for the duration of the trial. The vaccinated animals were largely protected against overt clinical disease from the challenge virus. Although viral genome was intermittently detected in blood samples, nasal and/or ocular swabs of vaccinated goats post challenge, viral RNA levels were significantly lower compared to unvaccinated control animals and vaccinated goats did not appear to excrete live virus. This protection, like the antibody response, was maintained at the same level for at least 15 months after vaccination. In addition, we showed that animals that have been vaccinated with the adenovirus-based vaccine can be revaccinated with the same vaccine after 12 months and showed an increased anti-PPRV antibody response after this boost vaccination. Such vaccines, which provide a DIVA capability, would therefore be suitable for use when the current live attenuated PPRV vaccines are withdrawn at the end of the ongoing global PPR eradication campaign.

Identifiers

PMID38830899
PMCPMC11148195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.