Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38830860›Full record

ReviewNature communications2024

Bottlenecks in biobased approaches to plastic degradation.

Amelia R Bergeson, Ashli J Silvera, Hal S Alper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Impacts of pollution on the soil microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. EngineeringiScience · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amelia R BergesonMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ashli J SilveraMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hal S AlperMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. halper@che.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-8605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic waste is an environmental challenge, but also presents a biotechnological opportunity as a unique carbon substrate. With modern biotechnological tools, it is possible to enable both recycling and upcycling. To realize a plastics bioeconomy, significant intrinsic barriers must be overcome using a combination of enzyme, strain, and process engineering. This article highlights advances, challenges, and opportunities for a variety of common plastics.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalPlasticsRecyclingBiotechnologyPlastics

Identifiers

PMID38830860
PMCPMC11148140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.