Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38830795›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2024

Comparison of seven CD19 CAR designs in engineering NK cells for enhancing anti-tumour activity.

Yao Wang, Jianhuan Li, Zhiqian Wang, Yanhong Liu, Tongjie Wang, Mengyun Zhang, Chengxiang Xia, Fan Zhang, Dehao Huang, Leqiang Zhang and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CD33Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Activation of FCGR2A enhances the antitumor efficacy of hPSC-derived CAR-M.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yao WangGuangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhuan LiGuangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqian WangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanhong LiuState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tongjie WangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mengyun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chengxiang XiaBeijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, China.
Fan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dehao HuangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Leqiang ZhangBeijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yaoqin ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lijuan LiuState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanping ZhuState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hanmeng QiBeijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaofan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology & National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Wenbin QianDepartment of Hematology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Fangxiao HuBeijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jinyong WangState Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020YFA0112404National Natural Science Foundation of China 81925002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer (CAR-NK) cell therapy is emerging as a promising cancer treatment, with notable safety and source diversity benefits over CAR-T cells. This study focused on optimizing CAR constructs for NK cells to maximize their therapeutic potential. We designed seven CD19 CAR constructs and expressed them in NK cells using a retroviral system, assessing their tumour-killing efficacy and persistence. Results showed all constructs enhanced tumour-killing and prolonged survival in tumour-bearing mice. In particular, CAR1 (CD8 TMD-CD3ζ SD)-NK cells showed superior efficacy in treating tumour-bearing animals and exhibited enhanced persistence when combined with OX40 co-stimulatory domain. Of note, CAR1-NK cells were most effective at lower effector-to-target ratios, while CAR4 (CD8 TMD-OX40 CD- FcεRIγ SD) compromised NK cell expansion ability. Superior survival rates were noted in mice treated with CAR1-, CAR2 (CD8 TMD- FcεRIγ SD)-, CAR3 (CD8 TMD-OX40 CD- CD3ζ SD)- and CAR4-NK cells over those treated with CAR5 (CD28 TMD- FcεRIγ SD)-, CAR6 (CD8 TMD-4-1BB CD-CD3ζ 1-ITAM SD)- and CAR7 (CD8 TMD-OX40 CD-CD3ζ 1-ITAM SD)-NK cells, with CAR5-NK cells showing the weakest anti-tumour activity. Increased expression of exhaustion markers, especially in CAR7-NK cells, suggests that combining CAR-NK cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors might improve anti-tumour outcomes. These findings provide crucial insights for developing CAR-NK cell products for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Immunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansMiceNeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38830795
PMCPMC11533075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.