Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38830105›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Natural scenes reveal diverse representations of 2D and 3D body pose in the human brain.

Hongru Zhu, Yijun Ge, Alexander Bratch, Alan Yuille, Kendrick Kay, Daniel Kersten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongru Zhu *Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-4088-3536
Yijun Ge *Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0002-3117-1414
Alexander BratchDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Alan YuilleDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-9155
Daniel KerstenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

Deep sampling of cognitive effects in the human visual systemR01EY034118 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLAYTON E CURTIS, Kendrick Norris Kay · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Towards a Compositional Generative Model of Human VisionR01EY029700 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KERSTEN, DANIEL J · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01EY029700National Science Foundation (NSF) IIS-1822683National Science Foundation (NSF) IIS-1822929NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029700NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pose, defined as the spatial relationships between body parts, carries instrumental information supporting the understanding of motion and action of a person. A substantial body of previous work has identified cortical areas responsive to images of bodies and different body parts. However, the neural basis underlying the visual perception of body part relationships has received less attention. To broaden our understanding of body perception, we analyzed high-resolution fMRI responses to a wide range of poses from over 4,000 complex natural scenes. Using ground-truth annotations and an application of three-dimensional (3D) pose reconstruction algorithms, we compared similarity patterns of cortical activity with similarity patterns built from human pose models with different levels of depth availability and viewpoint dependency. Targeting the challenge of explaining variance in complex natural image responses with interpretable models, we achieved statistically significant correlations between pose models and cortical activity patterns (though performance levels are substantially lower than the noise ceiling). We found that the 3D view-independent pose model, compared with two-dimensional models, better captures the activation from distinct cortical areas, including the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). These areas, together with other pose-selective regions in the LOTC, form a broader, distributed cortical network with greater view-tolerance in more anterior patches. We interpret these findings in light of the computational complexity of natural body images, the wide range of visual tasks supported by pose structures, and possible shared principles for view-invariant processing between articulated objects and ordinary, rigid objects.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsBrain MappingFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMalePhotic StimulationPostureVisual PerceptionYoung Adult3D posebody perceptionnatural imagesvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38830105
PMCPMC11181088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.