Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829909›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Chromosome-level genome assemblies of 2 hemichordates provide new insights into deuterostome origin and chromosome evolution.

Che-Yi Lin, Ferdinand Marlétaz, Alberto Pérez-Posada, Pedro Manuel Martínez-García, Siegfried Schloissnig, Paul Peluso, Greg T Conception, Paul Bump, Yi-Chih Chen, Cindy Chou and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insights into cephalochordate genome and gene evolution from the early-diverging amphioxusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deep homology of aScience advances · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Che-Yi LinInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ferdinand MarlétazCenter for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alberto Pérez-PosadaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Pedro Manuel Martínez-GarcíaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Siegfried SchloissnigVienna Biocenter, Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria.
Paul PelusoPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Greg T ConceptionPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Paul BumpHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.
Yi-Chih ChenInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cindy ChouInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Yi LinInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Pei FanInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chang-Tai TsaiInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
José Luis Gómez SkarmetaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Juan J TenaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain.
Christopher J LoweHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.
David R RankPacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Daniel S RokhsarChan-Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jr-Kai YuInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-0529
Yi-Hsien SuInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6798-9632

Funding

Academia Sinica, TaiwanBBSRC BB/V01109X/1Junta de AndalucíaNational Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deuterostomes are a monophyletic group of animals that includes Hemichordata, Echinodermata (together called Ambulacraria), and Chordata. The diversity of deuterostome body plans has made it challenging to reconstruct their ancestral condition and to decipher the genetic changes that drove the diversification of deuterostome lineages. Here, we generate chromosome-level genome assemblies of 2 hemichordate species, Ptychodera flava and Schizocardium californicum, and use comparative genomic approaches to infer the chromosomal architecture of the deuterostome common ancestor and delineate lineage-specific chromosomal modifications. We show that hemichordate chromosomes (1N = 23) exhibit remarkable chromosome-scale macrosynteny when compared to other deuterostomes and can be derived from 24 deuterostome ancestral linkage groups (ALGs). These deuterostome ALGs in turn match previously inferred bilaterian ALGs, consistent with a relatively short transition from the last common bilaterian ancestor to the origin of deuterostomes. Based on this deuterostome ALG complement, we deduced chromosomal rearrangement events that occurred in different lineages. For example, a fusion-with-mixing event produced an Ambulacraria-specific ALG that subsequently split into 2 chromosomes in extant hemichordates, while this homologous ALG further fused with another chromosome in sea urchins. Orthologous genes distributed in these rearranged chromosomes are enriched for functions in various developmental processes. We found that the deeply conserved Hox clusters are located in highly rearranged chromosomes and that maintenance of the clusters are likely due to lower densities of transposable elements within the clusters. We also provide evidence that the deuterostome-specific pharyngeal gene cluster was established via the combination of 3 pre-assembled microsyntenic blocks. We suggest that since chromosomal rearrangement events and formation of new gene clusters may change the regulatory controls of developmental genes, these events may have contributed to the evolution of diverse body plans among deuterostomes.

Indexed as

ChromosomesEvolution, MolecularGenomePhylogenyAnimalsChordataGenetic LinkageSynteny

Identifiers

PMID38829909
PMCPMC11175523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.