Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829906›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Incorporating Supramaximal Resection into Survival Stratification of IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma: A Refined Multi-institutional Recursive Partitioning Analysis.

Yae Won Park, Kyu Sung Choi, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Gianluca Brugnara, Rouzbeh Banan, Sooyon Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Ji Eun Park, Tobias Kessler, Martin Bendszus and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yae Won Park *Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-5401
Kyu Sung Choi *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-3307
Martha Foltyn-DumitruDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-2925-9176
Gianluca BrugnaraDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-1407
Rouzbeh BananDepartment of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-576X
Sooyon KimDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1607-6475
Kyunghwa HanDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-7237
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-4682
Tobias KesslerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-7074
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-6769
Sandro KriegDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4050-1531
Wolfgang WickDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6171-634X
Felix SahmDepartment of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-1962
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-2270
Ho Sung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-7421
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1509-9800
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7516-7372
Doonyaporn WongsawaengDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-5191
Jeffrey Michael PollockDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-779X
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-4072
Ramon Francisco BarajasDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-4168
Philipp VollmuthDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-0064
Sung Soo AhnDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-5558

Funding

Leveraging Biologically Specific PET/MRI Monitoring and Therapeutic Modulation of the Hypoxic Glioblastoma Tumor Immune Microenvironment into Improved OutcomesR37CA288577 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Ramon Francisco Barajas · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
Defining the Hypoxic Immunosuppressive Microenvironment as a Biomarker of Therapy Efficacy in Glioblastoma Using Iron Oxide Enhanced FMISO PET/MRIK08CA237809 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARAJAS, RAMON FRANCISCO · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
A multifunctional nanomaterial platform for reducing morbidity in medulloblastoma therapyR21NS135452 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARAJAS, RAMON FRANCISCO, YILDIRIM, ADEM · 2024 to 2025
$426k
Korea Medical Device Development Fund (KMDF) RS-2023-00224382NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237809NCI NIH HHS L30 CA220897NCI NIH HHS R37 CA288577NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS135452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo propose a novel recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification model in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas that incorporates the recently expanded conception of the extent of resection (EOR) in terms of both supramaximal and total resections. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis multicenter cohort study included a developmental cohort of 622 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas from a single institution (Severance Hospital) and validation cohorts of 536 patients from three institutions (Seoul National University Hospital, Asan Medical Center, and Heidelberg University Hospital). All patients completed standard treatment including concurrent chemoradiotherapy and underwent testing to determine their IDH mutation and MGMTp methylation status. EORs were categorized into either supramaximal, total, or non-total resections. A novel RPA model was then developed and compared with a previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) RPA model.

resultsIn the developmental cohort, the RPA model included age, MGMTp methylation status, Karnofsky performance status, and EOR. Younger patients with MGMTp methylation and supramaximal resections showed a more favorable prognosis [class I: median overall survival (OS) 57.3 months], whereas low-performing patients with non-total resections and without MGMTp methylation showed the worst prognosis (class IV: median OS 14.3 months). The prognostic significance of the RPA was subsequently confirmed in the validation cohorts, which revealed a greater separation between prognostic classes for all cohorts compared with the previous RTOG RPA model.

conclusionsThe proposed RPA model highlights the impact of supramaximal versus total resections and incorporates clinical and molecular factors into survival stratification. The RPA model may improve the accuracy of assessing prognostic groups. See related commentary by Karschnia et al., p. 4811.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID38829906
PMCPMC12125701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.