ArticlePloS one2024
Atomistic description of the OCTN1 recognition mechanism via in silico methods.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organic cation transporter novel 1 (OCTN1): beyond an ergothioneine transporter.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Involvement of mammalian SoLute Carriers (SLC) in the traffic of polyamines.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- OCTN1 mediates acetylcholine transport in the A549 lung cancer cells: possible pathophysiological implications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Correction: Atomistic description of the OCTN1 recognition mechanism via in silico methods.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Organic Cation Transporter Novel 1 (OCTN1), also known as SLC22A4, is widely expressed in various human tissues, and involved in numerous physiological and pathological processes remains. It facilitates the transport of organic cations, zwitterions, with selectivity for positively charged solutes. Ergothioneine, an antioxidant compound, and acetylcholine (Ach) are among its substrates. Given the lack of experimentally solved structures of this protein, this study aimed at generating a reliable 3D model of OCTN1 to shed light on its substrate-binding preferences and the role of sodium in substrate recognition and transport. A chimeric model was built by grafting the large extracellular loop 1 (EL1) from an AlphaFold-generated model onto a homology model. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed domain-specific mobility, with EL1 exhibiting the highest impact on overall stability. Molecular docking simulations identified cytarabine and verapamil as highest affinity ligands, consistent with their known inhibitory effects on OCTN1. Furthermore, MM/GBSA analysis allowed the categorization of substrates into weak, good, and strong binders, with molecular weight strongly correlating with binding affinity to the recognition site. Key recognition residues, including Tyr211, Glu381, and Arg469, were identified through interaction analysis. Ach demonstrated a low interaction energy, supporting the hypothesis of its one-directional transport towards to outside of the membrane. Regarding the role of sodium, our model suggested the involvement of Glu381 in sodium binding. Molecular dynamics simulations of systems at increasing levels of Na+ concentrations revealed increased sodium occupancy around Glu381, supporting experimental data associating Na+ concentration to molecule transport. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the 3D structure of OCTN1, its substrate-binding preferences, and the role of sodium in the recognition. These findings contribute to the understanding of OCTN1 involvement in various physiological and pathological processes and may have implications for drug development and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.