Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829692›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Health-related quality of life by type of breast surgery in women with primary breast cancer: prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Kim Gulis, Julia Ellbrant, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Tor Svensjö, Lisa Rydén

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04227613 (Prospective Study of Cosmetic Outcome and Quality of Life for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04227613 completednot on this map

Prospective Study of Cosmetic Outcome and Quality of Life for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorLund UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled351ConditionsBreast Neoplasm, Cosmetic Outcome, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim GulisDepartment of Surgery, Kristianstad Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-0760
Julia EllbrantDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3241-1109
Pär-Ola BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tor SvensjöDepartment of Surgery, Kristianstad Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-3130

Funding

National Health Service 018-40304north-eastern Hospitals in Skåne 85001-2040Research and Development Committee
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth-related quality of life and patient-related outcome measures for patients with cancer have gained increased interest over the last decade. However, few prospective studies with longitudinal data evaluated health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate how health-related quality of life changed from the time of diagnosis to 1 year after breast cancer surgery for the main surgical techniques.

methodsThis prospective longitudinal single-centre study included patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed in 2019-2020 who underwent surgery. Patients completed a health-related quality of life questionnaire (Breast-Q) at baseline. One year after surgery, they completed the Breast-Q a second time, the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) quality of life questionnaire-C30 and the quality of life questionnaire-BR23. Analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate the differences in health-related quality of life between surgical groups. Analysis of covariance with robust standard errors was used to adjust for confounders.

resultsIn total, 340 patients were included in the study; 160 patients received oncoplastic partial mastectomy, 112 received partial mastectomy, 42 received mastectomy and 26 had mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Patients that had partial mastectomy or oncoplastic partial mastectomy were more satisfied with their breasts (P < 0.001), had a better body image (P = 0.006) and higher sexual functioning scores (P = 0.027) than patients who had a mastectomy with/without reconstruction. The oncoplastic and mastectomy with reconstruction groups had more breast symptoms than other groups (P < 0.001), and the mastectomy group had the least symptoms from the chest area.

conclusionPartial mastectomy and oncoplastic partial mastectomy have the best outcomes in terms of breast satisfaction, body image and sexual functioning. This highlights the importance of preserving the breast when feasible and underscores that breast reconstruction is not equal to breast conservation. Registration number: NCT04227613 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomyQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38829692
PMCPMC11146426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.