Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829617›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Surgeon and Surgical Trainee Experiences After Adverse Patient Events.

Sara P Ginzberg, Julia A Gasior, Jesse E Passman, Jacob Stein, Shimrit Keddem, Jacqueline M Soegaard Ballester, Caitlin B Finn, Jennifer S Myers, Rachel R Kelz, Judy A Shea and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara P GinzbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.
Julia A GasiorPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jesse E PassmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.
Jacob SteinSackler School of Medicine New York State/American Program, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shimrit KeddemLeonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jacqueline M Soegaard BallesterDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.
Caitlin B FinnDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer S MyersCenter for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Rachel R KelzDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.
Judy A SheaLeonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Heather WachtelDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia.

Funding

A genotype-phenotype study of germline succinate dehydrogenase pathogenic variantsK08CA270385 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heather Wachtel · 2022 to 2026
$967k
HSRD VA IK2 HX003348NCI NIH HHS K08 CA270385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adverse patient events are inevitable in surgical practice. Objectives: To characterize the impact of adverse patient events on surgeons and trainees, identify coping mechanisms, and assess whether current forms of support are sufficient. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this mixed-methods study, a validated survey instrument was adapted and distributed to surgical trainees from 7 programs, and qualitative interviews were conducted with faculty from 4 surgical departments in an urban academic health system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The personal impact of adverse patient events, current coping mechanisms, and desired forms of support. Results: Of 216 invited trainees, 93 (43.1%) completed the survey (49 [52.7%] male; 60 [64.5%] in third postgraduate year or higher; 23 [24.7%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 6 [6.5%] Black, 51 [54.8%] White, and 8 [8.6%] other race; 13 [14.0%] Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity). Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited faculty completed interviews (13 [56.5%] male; median [IQR] years in practice, 11.0 [7.5-20.0]). Of the trainees, 77 (82.8%) endorsed involvement in at least 1 recent adverse event. Most reported embarrassment (67 of 79 trainees [84.8%]), rumination (64 of 78 trainees [82.1%]), and fear of attempting future procedures (51 of 78 trainees [65.4%]); 28 of 78 trainees (35.9%) had considered quitting. Female trainees and trainees who identified as having a race and/or ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White consistently reported more negative consequences compared with male and White trainees. The most desired form of support was the opportunity to discuss the incident with an attending physician (76 of 78 respondents [97.4%]). Similarly, faculty described feelings of guilt and shame, loss of confidence, and distraction after adverse events. Most described the utility of confiding in peers and senior colleagues, although some expressed unwillingness to reach out. Several suggested designating a departmental point person for event debriefing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this mixed-methods study of the personal impact of adverse events on surgeons and trainees, these events were nearly universally experienced and caused significant distress. Providing formal support mechanisms for both surgical trainees and faculty may decrease stigma and restore confidence, particularly for underrepresented groups.

Indexed as

SurgeonsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMedical ErrorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38829617
PMCPMC11148685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.