Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829555›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Clinical validation of the accuracy of an intra-operative assessment tool using 3D ultrasound compared to histopathology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

N M Bekedam, E L Koot, E M V de Cuba, M J A van Alphen, R L P van Veen, L H E Karssemakers, L E Smeele, M B Karakullukcu

Abstract readValidation StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Textbook Outcome After Oral Cancer Surgery as a Composite Measure for Survival and Quality-of-Care Evaluation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Improved ground truth annotation by multimodal image registration from 3D ultrasound to histopathology for resected tongue carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N M BekedamDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.bekedam@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6506-7554
E L KootDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E M V de CubaDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J A van AlphenDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Verwelius 3D Lab, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6707
R L P van VeenDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Verwelius 3D Lab, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-7422
L H E KarssemakersDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-8709
L E SmeeleDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-4760
M B KarakullukcuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-5743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistopathological analysis often shows close resection margins after surgical removal of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study aimed to investigate the agreement between intraoperative 3D ultrasound (US) margin assessment and postoperative histopathology of resected TSCC.

methodsIn this study, ten patients were prospectively included. Three fiducial cannulas were inserted into the specimen. To acquire a motorized 3D US volume, the resected specimen was submerged in saline, after which images were acquired while the probe moved over the specimen. The US volumes were annotated twice: (1) automatically and (2) manually, with the automatic segmentation as initialization. After standardized histopathological processing, all hematoxylin-eosin whole slide images (WSI) were included for analysis. Corresponding US images were found based on the known WSI spacing and fiducials. Blinded observers measured the tumor thickness and the margin in the caudal, deep, and cranial directions on every slide. The anterior and posterior margin was measured per specimen.

resultsThe mean difference in all measurements between manually segmented US and histopathology was 2.34 (SD: ±3.34) mm, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.733 (p < 0.001). The smallest mean difference was in the tumor thickness with 0.80 (SD: ±2.44) mm and a correlation of 0.836 (p < 0.001). Limitations were observed in the caudal region, where no correlation was found.

conclusionThis study shows that 3D US and histopathology have a moderate to strong statistically significant correlation (r = 0.733; p < 0.001) and a mean difference between the modalities of 2.3 mm (95%CI: -4.2; 8.9). Future research should focus on patient outcomes regarding resection margins.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellImaging, Three-DimensionalMargins of ExcisionTongue NeoplasmsUltrasonographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies3D UltrasoundHistopathologyOral cancerResection marginSquamous cell carcinomaTongue

Identifiers

PMID38829555
PMCPMC11416359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.