Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829528›Full record

ArticlePlanta2024

Floral scent changes in response to pollen removal are rare in buzz-pollinated Solanum.

C Douglas Moore, Dudley I Farman, Tiina Särkinen, Philip C Stevenson, Mario Vallejo-Marín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Olfactory Responses ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C Douglas MooreBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. c.d.moore@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-4273
Dudley I FarmanNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-3672
Tiina SärkinenRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-3093
Philip C StevensonNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-3619
Mario Vallejo-MarínBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-8025

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/L002590/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionOne of seven Solanum taxa studied displayed associations between pollen presence and floral scent composition and volume, suggesting buzz-pollinated plants rarely use scent as an honest cue for foraging pollinators. Floral scent influences the recruitment, learning, and behaviour of floral visitors. Variation in floral scent can provide information on the amount of reward available or whether a flower has been visited recently and may be particularly important in species with visually concealed rewards. In many buzz-pollinated flowers, tubular anthers opening via small apical pores (poricidal anthers) visually conceal pollen and appear similar regardless of pollen quantity within the anther. We investigated whether pollen removal changes floral scent composition and emission rate in seven taxa of buzz-pollinated Solanum (Solanaceae). We found that pollen removal reduced both the overall emission of floral scent and the emission of specific compounds (linalool and farnesol) in S. lumholtzianum. Our findings suggest that in six out of seven buzz-pollinated taxa studied here, floral scent could not be used as a signal by visitors as it does not contain information on pollen availability.

Indexed as

FlowersOdorantsPollenPollinationSolanumAnimalsBeesChemical ecologyConcealed rewardFloral scentLinaloolPlant ecologyPlant–pollinator signallingPollinationPoricidal flowerVolatile organic compound

Identifiers

PMID38829528
PMCPMC11147924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.