ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2024
[Recommendations of the new S1 guidelines on airway management].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct- versus video laryngoscopy during suction assisted laryngoscopy and airway decontamination (SALAD): A randomized controlled simulation study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Prospective development and validation of an objective classification for difficult facemask ventilation: the MASCAN score.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Predicting Difficult Tracheal Intubation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Osteoradionecrosis: Development of the ORN-Difficult-Airway-Score.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Value of video laryngoscopy as universal primary intubation technique for anesthesiological practice : Narrative review].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- Comparison of different tracheal intubation methods for unstable upper cervical spine injuries in a human cadaver model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- [Utilization of apneic oxygenation in anesthesiology: a nationwide survey in Germany].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
- [Management of neuromuscular block during general anesthesia : Results of a survey in Germany in 2020 compared to the recommendations of the first European guidelines in 2023].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
- Heidelberg Adult and Pediatric Airway Registry (HAPA-Registry).Methods and protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German guidelines for airway management aim to optimize the care of patients undergoing anesthesia or intensive care. The preanesthesia evaluation is an important component for detection of anatomical and physiological indications for difficult mask ventilation and intubation. If predictors for a difficult or impossible mask ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation are present the airway should be secured while maintaining spontaneous breathing. In an unexpectedly difficult intubation, attempts to secure the airway should be limited to two with each method used. A video laryngoscope is recommended after an unsuccessful direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, a video laryngoscope should be available at every anesthesiology workspace throughout the hospital. Securing the airway should primarily be performed with a video laryngoscope in critically ill patients and patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration. Experienced personnel should perform or supervise airway management in the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38829521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.