Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829450›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2024

Cytotoxic and molecular differences of anticancer agents on 2D and 3D cell culture.

Mohammad Alwahsh, Amani Al-Doridee, Suhair Jasim, Oriana Awwad, Roland Hergenröder, Lama Hamadneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pyrimethamine Triggers the Apoptotic Pathway in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma in Cell-Based Models.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad AlwahshFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, 17138, Jordan. m.alwahsh@zuj.edu.jo.
Amani Al-DorideeFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, 17138, Jordan.
Suhair JasimFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, 17138, Jordan.
Oriana AwwadDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Roland HergenröderDepartment of Bioanalytics, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Lama HamadnehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan.

Funding

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 2022-2023/17/48Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KU1216I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer and multidrug resistance are regarded as concerns related to poor health outcomes. It was found that the monolayer of 2D cancer cell cultures lacks many important features compared to Multicellular Tumor Spheroids (MCTS) or 3D cell cultures which instead have the ability to mimic more closely the in vivo tumor microenvironment. This study aimed to produce 3D cell cultures from different cancer cell lines and to examine the cytotoxic activity of anticancer medications on both 2D and 3D systems, as well as to detect alterations in the expression of certain genes levels.

method3D cell culture was produced using 3D microtissue molds. The cytotoxic activities of colchicine, cisplatin, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel were tested on 2D and 3D cell culture systems obtained from different cell lines (A549, H1299, MCF-7, and DU-145). IC50 values were determined by MTT assay. In addition, gene expression levels of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN were evaluated by qPCR.

resultsSimilar cytotoxic activities were observed on both 3D and 2D cell cultures, however, higher concentrations of anticancer medications were needed for the 3D system. For instance, paclitaxel showed an IC50 of 6.234 µM and of 13.87 µM on 2D and 3D H1299 cell cultures, respectively. Gene expression of PIK3CA in H1299 cells also showed a higher fold change in 3D cell culture compared to 2D system upon treatment with doxorubicin.

conclusionWhen compared to 2D cell cultures, the behavior of cells in the 3D system showed to be more resistant to anticancer treatments. Due to their shape, growth pattern, hypoxic core features, interaction between cells, biomarkers synthesis, and resistance to treatment penetration, the MCTS have the advantage of better simulating the in vivo tumor conditions. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that 3D cell cultures may be a more promising model than the traditional 2D system, offering a better understanding of the in vivo molecular changes in response to different potential treatments and multidrug resistance development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Culture TechniquesSpheroids, CellularCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDoxorubicinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsNeoplasmsPaclitaxelTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDoxorubicinPaclitaxelAnticancer drugsPIK3CA/AKT/PTEN pathwayThree-dimensional (3D) cell cultureTwo-dimensional (2D) cell culture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.