ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Endoscopic endonasal resection of symptomatic Rathke's cleft cysts: outcomes of the strategy to maintain the fenestration open.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study intends to clarify the optimal endoscopic endonasal surgical strategy for symptomatic Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with RCCs that underwent EEA surgery. The strategy for surgical and reconstruction method selection was presented. Patients were split into groups of fenestration open or closed. Pre- and postoperative symptoms, imaging, ophthalmologic, and endocrinologic exams were reviewed. The incidence of complications and the recurrence rates were determined.
resultsThe 75 individuals were all received primary operations. The fenestration closed group contained 32 cases, while the fenestration open group contained 43 cases. The median follow-up period was 39 months. The three primary complaints were headache (n = 51, 68.00%), vision impairment (n = 45, 60.00%), and pituitary dysfunction (n = 16, 21.33%). Of the 51 patients with preoperative headaches, 48 (94.12%) reported improvement in their symptoms following surgery. Twenty-three out of 45 patients (51.11%) experienced an improvement in visual impairment. Pituitary dysfunction was found improved in 14 out of 16 individuals (87.50%). There was no discernible difference in the rate of symptom alleviation between both groups. There were three patients (3/75, 4.00%) had cyst reaccumulation. One of them (1/75, 1.33%), which needed reoperation, was healed using pterional approach. In term of complications, cerebral infections occurred in two patients (2/75, 2.67%). Both of them recovered after antibiotic treatment. No postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea occurred. One patient (1/75, 1.33%) in the open group experienced epistaxis. There was no persistent hypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus (DI). Analysis of headache related factors showed that the presence of wax like nodules was related to it.
conclusionRCC was successfully treated with endoscopic endonasal surgery with few problems when the fenestration was kept as open as feasible. Preoperative identification of T2WI hypointense nodules may be a potential reference factor for surgical indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38829433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.