Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829285›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2024

The role of chaperone-mediated autophagy in drug resistance.

Ana Beatriz da Silva Teixeira, Maria Carolina Clares Ramalho, Izadora de Souza, Izabela Amélia Marques de Andrade, Isabeli Yumi Araújo Osawa, Camila Banca Guedes, Beatriz Silva de Oliveira, Cláudio Henrique Dahne de Souza Filho, Tainá Lins da Silva, Natália Cestari Moreno and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana Beatriz da Silva TeixeiraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-6714
Maria Carolina Clares RamalhoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-6152
Izadora de SouzaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6935-7521
Izabela Amélia Marques de AndradeUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Isabeli Yumi Araújo OsawaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3024
Camila Banca GuedesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-1055
Beatriz Silva de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-5277
Cláudio Henrique Dahne de Souza FilhoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Tainá Lins da SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0385-3168
Natália Cestari MorenoNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Laboratory of Genomic Integrity, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marcela Teatin LatanciaNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Laboratory of Genomic Integrity, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-7105
Clarissa Ribeiro Reily RochaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Oncologia Clínica e Experimental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9634-4307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the search for alternatives to overcome the challenge imposed by drug resistance development in cancer treatment, the modulation of autophagy has emerged as a promising alternative that has achieved good results in clinical trials. Nevertheless, most of these studies have overlooked a novel and selective type of autophagy: chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Following its discovery, research into CMA's contribution to tumor progression has accelerated rapidly. Therefore, we now understand that stress conditions are the primary signal responsible for modulating CMA in cancer cells. In turn, the degradation of proteins by CMA can offer important advantages for tumorigenesis, since tumor suppressor proteins are CMA targets. Such mutual interaction between the tumor microenvironment and CMA also plays a crucial part in establishing therapy resistance, making this discussion the focus of the present review. Thus, we highlight how suppression of LAMP2A can enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to several drugs, just as downregulation of CMA activity can lead to resistance in certain cases. Given this panorama, it is important to identify selective modulators of CMA to enhance the therapeutic response.

Identifiers

PMID38829285
PMCPMC11145944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.