Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829045›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2024

Macrophage fate: to kill or not to kill?

Armando M Marrufo, Ana Lidia Flores-Mireles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Are Sputum High Mobility Group Box 1 and D-Dimer Changes Relevant Markers of Tissue Damage and Fibrinolysis in Cystic Fibrosis?Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Role of Clot Formation and Plasminogen Activation in Lower Urinary Tract Pathologies.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  20. Infection and immunity · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Armando M MarrufoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5851-5539
Ana Lidia Flores-MirelesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4610-4246

Funding

Understanding the role of catheter-associated protein deposition in the development of CAUTIR01DK128805 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI FLORES-MIRELES, ANA LIDIA, HOWELL, CAITLIN L · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK128805HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK12880501-A1S1NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128805Open Philanthropy Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are dynamic innate immune cells that either reside in tissue, serving as sentinels, or recruited as monocytes from bone marrow into inflamed and infected tissue. In response to cues in the tissue microenvironment (TME), macrophages polarize on a continuum toward M1 or M2 with diverse roles in progression and resolution of disease. M1-like macrophages exhibit proinflammatory functions with antimicrobial and anti-tumorigenic activities, while M2-like macrophages have anti-inflammatory functions that generally resolve inflammatory responses and orchestrate a tissue healing process. Given these opposite phenotypes, proper spatiotemporal coordination of macrophage polarization in response to cues within the TME is critical to effectively resolve infectious disease and regulate wound healing. However, if this spatiotemporal coordination becomes disrupted due to persistent infection or dysregulated coagulation, macrophages' inappropriate response to these cues will result in the development of diseases with clinically unfavorable outcomes. Since plasticity and heterogeneity are hallmarks of macrophages, they are attractive targets for therapies to reprogram toward specific phenotypes that could resolve disease and favor clinical prognosis. In this review, we discuss how basic science studies have elucidated macrophage polarization mechanisms in TMEs during infections and inflammation, particularly coagulation. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of macrophage polarization within TMEs in diseases is important in further development of targeted therapies.

Indexed as

MacrophagesAnimalsHumansInflammationMacrophage Activationcoagulationinnate immunityM1M1/M2M2macrophage polarizationmacrophagestissue microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38829045
PMCPMC11385966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.