Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38828964›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2024

Reconstructive surgery after distal fibular resection due to bone tumors: a technical report on surgical strategies and results from the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews.

Andrea Angelini, Ivan Bohacek, Mihovil Plecko, Carlo Biz, Giulia Trovarelli, Mariachiara Cerchiaro, Giuseppe Di Rubbo, Pietro Ruggieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea AngeliniDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-448X
Ivan BohacekDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Salata, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mihovil PleckoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Salata, Zagreb, Croatia.
Carlo BizDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8517-0057
Giulia TrovarelliDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.
Mariachiara CerchiaroDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.
Giuseppe Di RubboDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.
Pietro RuggieriDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Oncological Orthopedics, University of Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-9882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Primary bone tumors of the fibula are rare. Distal fibular resection has a significant impact on ankle biomechanics and gait, possibly leading to complications such as ankle instability, valgus deformity, and degenerative changes. Question: Is there a need for reconstructive surgery after distal fibular resection, and what reconstructive procedures are available? Materials and methods: The review is registered with the PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews. Inclusion criteria consisted of all levels of evidence, human studies, patients of all ages and genders, publication in English, and resection of the distal portion of the fibula due to tumor pathology. The reviewers defined four different categories of interest by method of treatment. Additional articles of interest during full-text review were also added. Results: The initial search resulted with a total of 2958 records. After screening, a total of 50 articles were included in the study. Articles were divided into 'No reconstruction', 'Soft tissue reconstruction', 'Bone and soft tissue reconstruction', and 'Arthrodesis, arthroplasty or other reconstruction options' groups. Conclusion: Limb salvage surgery should be followed by reconstruction in order to avoid complications. Soft tissue reconstructions should always be considered to stabilize the joint after fibular resection. Bone reconstruction with reversed vascularized fibula is the preferred technique in young patients and in cases of bone defects more than 3 cm, while arthrodesis should be considered in adult patients. Whenever possible for oncologic reason, if a residual peroneal malleolus could be preserved, we prefer augmentation with a sliding ipsilateral fibular graft.

Indexed as

ankle stabilizationsoft tissuesurgical reconstructiontechniquetendon transfer

Identifiers

PMID38828964
PMCPMC11195336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.