Observational studyMovement disorders clinical practice2024
The Application of Goal Attainment Scaling in Cervical Dystonia - An Exploratory Observational Pilot Study.
Observational study in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Goal Attainment Scale Refines Patient-Centered Expectations in Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Cervical Dystonia.Journal of movement disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to its heterogeneous manifestation an individualized approach to reach therapeutic goals in cervical dystonia (CD) is advantageous.
objectivesThe aim of the current study was to adapt goal attainment scaling (GAS) to drive the management of CD.
methods38 patients with CD, regularly treated with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), were involved in the current exploratory observational pilot study. GAS, including domains of motor, pain, disability, and psychiatric features, was applied to set up individualized goals with the calculation of initial GAS T-scores. Following at least 4 BoNT injection cycles, patients were reassessed whether they reached the pre-set goals.
resultsThe initial GAS T-scores (median: 36.9, range: 22.8-40) significantly improved (P < 0.001) to the end of the study (the median of final GAS T-scores: 50, range: 25.5-63.6).
conclusionsThe applicability of GAS in CD patients was confirmed, but further large-scale studies are needed refining this innovative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.