SynthesisGlobal health action2024
Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review.Global health action · 2024Pooled it
- Impacts of Residential Segregation and Comorbidity on Racial Disparities in Acute Care Utilization.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Accessibility of Otolaryngology Care in Virginia: A Geospatial Workforce Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Review
- Urgent care utilization patterns in Switzerland: a population-based cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Current situation and influencing factors of emergency department visits by non-urgent young and middle-aged patients in China: A retrospective study.Belitung nursing journal · 2026Article
- Driving factors in pediatric emergency department use: an ecological retrospective study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Role of distance in the utilization of emergency departments for non-traumatic dental conditions in Maryland, USA, 2017-2021.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Factors that contribute to non-urgent utilization of emergency services in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
- Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of Emergency Departments (EDs) for non-urgent medical conditions is a global public health concern.
objectivesA systematic review, guided by a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023398674), was conducted to interpret the association between distance as a measure of healthcare access and the utilization of EDs for non-urgent care in high- and middle-income countries.
methodsThe search was conducted on 22 August 2023 across five databases using controlled vocabulary and natural language keywords. Eligibility criteria included studies that examined non-urgent care, and featured concepts of emergency departments, non-urgent health services and distance, reported in English. Articles and abstracts where patients were transported by ambulance/paramedic services, referred/transferred from another hospital to an ED, or those that measured distance to an ED from another health facility were excluded. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework informed the quality of evidence.
resultsFifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies demonstrated satisfactory quality with regard to study design, conduct, analysis and presentation of results. Eight (53.3%) of the studies (1 paediatric, 4 all ages/adult, 3 ecological) found a moderate level of evidence of an inverse association between distance and ED visit volume or utilization for non-urgent medical conditions, while the remaining studies reported very low or low evidence.
conclusionsHalf of the studies reported non-urgent ED use to be associated with shortest distance traveled or transportation time. This finding bears implications for healthcare policies aiming to reduce ED use for non-urgent care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.