Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38828477›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health action2024

Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review.

Uma Kelekar, Debasree Das Gupta, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Emily Fashingbauer, Boyen Huang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uma KelekarInnovation, Leadership and Technology/Center for Optimal Aging, Marymount University College of Business, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-5432
Debasree Das GuptaKinesiology and Health Science Department, Utah State University Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Logan, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-5313
Nicole Theis-MahonHealth Sciences Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-5195
Emily FashingbauerMinnesota State University College of Allied Health and Nursing, Mankato, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4775-8869
Boyen HuangUniversity of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-7447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Emergency Departments (EDs) for non-urgent medical conditions is a global public health concern.

objectivesA systematic review, guided by a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023398674), was conducted to interpret the association between distance as a measure of healthcare access and the utilization of EDs for non-urgent care in high- and middle-income countries.

methodsThe search was conducted on 22 August 2023 across five databases using controlled vocabulary and natural language keywords. Eligibility criteria included studies that examined non-urgent care, and featured concepts of emergency departments, non-urgent health services and distance, reported in English. Articles and abstracts where patients were transported by ambulance/paramedic services, referred/transferred from another hospital to an ED, or those that measured distance to an ED from another health facility were excluded. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework informed the quality of evidence.

resultsFifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies demonstrated satisfactory quality with regard to study design, conduct, analysis and presentation of results. Eight (53.3%) of the studies (1 paediatric, 4 all ages/adult, 3 ecological) found a moderate level of evidence of an inverse association between distance and ED visit volume or utilization for non-urgent medical conditions, while the remaining studies reported very low or low evidence.

conclusionsHalf of the studies reported non-urgent ED use to be associated with shortest distance traveled or transportation time. This finding bears implications for healthcare policies aiming to reduce ED use for non-urgent care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareDistancedistance decay effectemergency departmentnon-urgent utilizationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38828477
PMCPMC11149577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.