ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Are relative contraindications for unicompartmental knee replacements in medial compartment osteoarthritis really contraindications?
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of patellofemoral joint diseases on functional outcomes and prosthesis survival in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Five-year patient-reported outcomes after fixed-bearing medial UKA with broad patient selection.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- The effect of Kellgren-Lawrence grade on functional outcome following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medial unicompartment knee replacement (UKR) is performed for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Understanding the factors influencing functional outcomes helps patient selection and outcomes. We will review the association between pre-operative BMI and patellofemoral articular wear on post operative Oxford Knee Scores at >2 and > 5 years. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Inclusion criteria were medial UKR for medial compartment OA. The exclusion criteria were age <16, revision procedures and lateral UKR's. Data was collected between 26/6/2014 and 25/8/2022. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Significance was given to variables that reached p < 0.05. Results: 159 UKR procedures were identified in 155 patients. 116 procedures carried out on 111 patients had follow up at > 2 years. At 5 years there were 14 patients had OKS recorded. There was no statistical difference in the ICRS grade I&II vs III&IV groups for >2 year or >5 year OKS with p = 0.408 and p = 0.876. For BMI there was a moderately negative correlation on spearman's rank p(df) = -0.339 (CI 95 % -0.538, -0.104) at >2 years, which was statistically significant with p = 0.004. >5 year data didn't reach significance with p = 0.828. Conclusion: BMI maybe an important patient factor in predicting post operative OKS at 2-5 years. This is beneficial to surgeons for patient selection in medial UKR. Patellofemoral wear doesn't appear to impact on post operative functional outcomes. This supports the theory that patient who suffer from patellofemoral wear, as well as medial compartment wear can benefit from UKR, expanding the current indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.