ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024
Resistance training in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Though popular after joint replacement surgery, progressive resistance training (PRT) has controversial safety and efficacy claims. Therefore, PRT's effect on early postoperative muscle strength and functional capacity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) must be thoroughly investigated. Between May 12, 2020, and February 12, 2002, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases containing pertinent literature were thoroughly reviewed for this investigation. Methods: Out of 704 studies, 9 (TKA) met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, involving 1021 adult patients. The analysis encompassed various post-TKA indicators at 1, 3, and 12 months, including the 6-Minute Walk Test (6-WMT), Stair Climbing Performance (SCP), leg extension strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Sit-to-Stand (ST) repetitions. Results: In TKA patients, 6-WMT within 1 month (95 % CI = -0.41, 1.53), 3 months (95 % CI = -0.27, 0.76), and 12 months (95 % CI = -0.29, 0.66) did not show any significant differences. There were no discernible changes in ST at various time intervals, SCP, leg extension strength, and TUG at 1 month (95 % CI = -1.75, 0.77), 3 months (95 % CI = -0.48, 0.33), and 12 months (95 % CI = -0.44, 0.35). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (95 % CI = -0.01, 0.10). Conclusion: Early post-TKA PRT demonstrated no significant differences compared to Standard Rehabilitation (SR) regarding functional capacity, muscle strength recovery, and adverse event incidence. Therefore, PRT is a feasible option for promoting swift recovery post-total knee arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.