ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2024
Laboratory specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens at Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Ethiopia: prospective cross-sectional study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sample Rejection Rate, Reasons for Rejection and Associated Factors Among Clinical Specimens Requested for Diagnostic Testing at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, South Gondar Zone, North West Ethiopia, 2025: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Pre-analytical errors during HIV viral load (HIV-VL) and early infant diagnosis (EID) testing in Cameroon.PloS one · 2026Article
- Frequency and Associated Factors of Clotted and Hemolyzed Samples in South Gonder Hospitals, Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study, 2023.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: laboratory errors mostly emerge from the pre-analytical phase, mainly those related to collection, handling, transportation, and storage of diagnostic specimens. Specimen rejection due to improper sample collection, may lead to poor patient outcomes, such as incorrect diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, and death. This study aimed to assess the specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens at Debre Markos Referral Hospital. Methods: a prospective cross-sectional study design was applied from January 2020 to April 2020 to investigate specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens. The study population was all laboratory specimens referred for viral load, CD4 count, gene expert, and early infant diagnosis to the Debre Markos Referral Hospital laboratory. The statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 software. Results: of the total of 2750 specimens submitted to the laboratory from January 2020 to April 2020, 37 (1.34%) specimens were rejected due to different reasons like insufficient volume, hemolysis, and an inappropriate specimen container. Specimen collector training status and experience had a significant association with the specimen rejection rate. Conclusion: the results of our study show that the specimen rejection rate among referred specimens was high, indicating that more interventions are required to decrease the specimen rejection rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.