Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38828350›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A prognostic binary classifier comprised of five critical mRNAs stratified pancreatic cancer patients following resection.

Yueqing Lu, Tong Zhou, Mingshu Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yueqing LuHepatobiliary and Vascular Surgery, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 271199, Shandong Province, China.
Tong ZhouHepatobiliary and Vascular Surgery, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 271199, Shandong Province, China.
Mingshu LuHepatobiliary and Vascular Surgery, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 271199, Shandong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is characterized by an extremely poor prognosis, even following potentially curative resection. Classical prognostic markers such as histopathological or clinical parameters have limited predictive power. The present study aimed to establish a prognostic model combining mRNA expression data with histopathological and clinical data to better predict survival and stratify pancreatic cancer patients following resection. We pioneered three models in one study and systematically evaluated the clinical benefits of all three models. Methods: To identify differentially expressed genes in pancreatic cancer, mRNA data from normal (GTEx database) and pancreatic cancer (TCGA database) tissues were used. Survival analysis was carried out to identify prognosis-relevant genes from the identified differentially expressed genes and LASSO regression was used to filter out hub genes. The risk score of several hub genes was calculated according to gene expression and coefficients. Validation was carried out using an independent set of GEO microarray data. Multivariate COX regression was used for identifying independent clinical and pathological risk factors related to patient's survival in the TCGA database and a prognostic model combining mRNA expression data with histopathological and clinical data was established. Another prognostic model using clinicopathological factors from the SEER database was conceived based on multivariate COX regression. NRI (net reclassification improvement) and IDI (integrated discrimination index) were used to compare the predictive capabilities of the different models. Results: We identified 1589 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through the comparison of normal and pancreatic cancer tissues, of whom 317 were associated with prognosis(p < 0.05). LASSO regression identified five hub genes, MYEOV, ANXA2P2, MET, CEP55, and KRT7, that were used for the five-mRNA-classifier prognostic model. The classifier could stratify patients into a short and long survival group: 5-year overall survival in the training set (TCGA, 6 % vs 52 %, p < 0.001), test set (TCGA, 18 % vs 55 %,p < 0.01) and external validation set (GEO, 0 % vs 25 %, p < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that the mRNA model (model 1) was better than the clinicopathological no-mRNA model (model 2) in predicting 5-year survival in the TCGA database (AUC: 0.877 vs 0.718, z = 3.165, p < 0.01) and better than the multi-factor prognostic model (model 3) from the SEER database (AUC: 0.754, z = 2.637, p < 0.01). On predictive performance, model 1 improved model 2 (NRI = 0.084, z = 1.288, p = 0.198; IDI = 0.055, z = 1.041,p = 0.298) and model 3 (NRI = 0.167,z = 1.961,p = 0.05; IDI = 0.086, z = 1.427, p = 0.154). Conclusion: The five-mRNA-classifier is a reliable and feasible instrument to predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients following resection. It might help in patiens counseling and assist clinicians in providing individualized treatment for patients in different risk groups.

Indexed as

ClassifiermRNAPancreatic cancerPDACPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID38828350
PMCPMC11140619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.