ArticleHeliyon2024
Corporate governance, technological innovation, and corporate performance: Evidence from China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-09-12Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corporate governance plays an important role in achieving high-quality economic development and sustainable corporate development. In recent years, as listed companies face increasing challenges in social responsibility issues such as environmental pollution and financial fraud, corporate governance has received widespread attention from academics and practitioners. In particular, technological innovation has attracted much attention to the development of enterprises. This paper also explores the intermediary mechanism of technological innovation based on the output measurement method of technological innovation. This study selected data from companies listed on the A-share main board of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in China from 2012 to 2022, aiming to explore the relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance. At the same time, we further analyzed the impact of corporate governance on corporate performance based on the mediating role of technological innovation. The research results show that equity balance degree, board size, and executive incentives all have a positive impact on corporate performance. Technological innovation has a certain mediating effect on independent variables (equity balance degree, board size, and executive incentives) and corporate performance. This study clarifies the controversy about the relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance and deepens the understanding of this relationship. It also provides empirical support for listed companies to pay attention to and improve corporate governance levels and enhance innovation capabilities. By exploring the interplay between governance mechanisms, innovation processes, and performance outcomes, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how organizations can leverage governance practices to drive innovation-led growth and sustainable success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.