ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between circulating cell traits and renal disorders.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the causal relationships between circulating cell traits and risk of renal disorders. Methods: We applied a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) databases were utilized. Genetically predicted instrumental variables of human blood cell traits were extracted from Blood Cell Consortium (BCX) while data on renal diseases was obtained from Finngen consortium. The primary MR analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, with the weighted median (WM) and MR-Egger models used as additional methods. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-PRESSO, radial regression and MR-Egger intercept were conducted to detect outliers and assess horizontal pleiotropy. We further utilized the leave-one-out analysis to assess the robustness of the results. Causal associations were considered significant based on false rate correction (FDR), specifically when the IVW method provided a Results: Our results demonstrated that both white blood cell (WBC) count (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.10-2.06, Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence of causal associations of circulating WBC count, lymphocyte count and IgA nephropathy, WBC count and renal malignant neoplasms, and eosinophil count and diabetic nephropathy. These results have the potential to contribute to the development of novel diagnostic options and therapeutic strategies for renal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.