ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of delirium in elderly patients following intensive care unit admission: a derivation and validation study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for delirium in ICU patients: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Weak-Supervision Expectation-Maximization Framework for Identifying Decisional Vulnerability in Older Emergency Department Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an online interpretable machine-learning model for predicting delirium risk in acute heart failure.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based risk classification of depressive symptoms among patients with hearing loss: evidence from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence for delirium prediction with Electronic Health Records (EHR): a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development of an online prediction tool for immunotherapy-related adverse events in patients with advanced NSCLC based on machine learning and temporal validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Online machine learning model for predicting delirium risk in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease: development and preliminary validation.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Predicting ICU Delirium in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Using Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Admission Data: A Machine Learning Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Machine learning prediction model with shap interpretation for chronic bronchitis risk assessment based on heavy metal exposure: a nationally representative study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Development and internal verification of nomogram for forecasting delirium in the elderly admitted to intensive care units: an analysis of MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in intensive care unit nursing: A narrative review (2020-2025).Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Delirium is the most common neuropsychological complication among older adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and is often associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) for early delirium prediction in older ICU patients. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study and patient data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Feature variables associated with delirium, including predisposing factors, disease-related factors, and iatrogenic and environmental factors, were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and prediction models were built using logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbors and naive Bayes methods. Multiple metrics were used for evaluation of performance of the models, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, recall, F1 score, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to improve the interpretability of the final model. Results: Nine thousand seven hundred forty-eight adults aged 65 years or older were included for analysis. Twenty-six features were selected to construct ML prediction models. Among the models compared, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance including the highest AUC (0.836), accuracy (0.765), sensitivity (0.713), recall (0.713), and F1 score (0.725) in the training set. It also exhibited excellent discrimination with AUC of 0.810, good calibration, and had the highest net benefit in the validation cohort. The SHAP summary analysis showed that Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanical ventilation, and sedation were the top three risk features for outcome prediction. The SHAP dependency plot and SHAP force analysis interpreted the model at both the factor level and individual level, respectively. Conclusion: ML is a reliable tool for predicting the risk of critical delirium in elderly patients. By combining XGBoost and SHAP, it can provide clear explanations for personalized risk prediction and more intuitive understanding of the effect of key features in the model. The establishment of such a model would facilitate the early risk assessment and prompt intervention for delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.