ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Improved tomato leaf disease classification through adaptive ensemble models with exponential moving average fusion and enhanced weighted gradient optimization.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid deep learning and fuzzy logic framework for robust tomato disease detection and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive recognition network for few-shot plant diseases and pests based on homeostatic neuromodulation and meta-plasticity.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A lightweight hybrid model for scalable and robust plant leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning based ensemble model for accurate tomato leaf disease classification by leveraging ResNet50 and MobileNetV2 architectures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An improved ShuffleNetV2 method based on ensemble self-distillation for tomato leaf diseases recognition.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tomato is one of the most popular and most important food crops consumed globally. The quality and quantity of yield by tomato plants are affected by the impact made by various kinds of diseases. Therefore, it is essential to identify these diseases early so that it is possible to reduce the occurrences and effect of the diseases on tomato plants to improve the overall crop yield and to support the farmers. In the past, many research works have been carried out by applying the machine learning techniques to segment and classify the tomato leaf images. However, the existing machine learning-based classifiers are not able to detect the new types of diseases more accurately. On the other hand, deep learning-based classifiers with the support of swarm intelligence-based optimization techniques are able to enhance the classification accuracy, leading to the more effective and accurate detection of leaf diseases. This research paper proposes a new method for the accurate classification of tomato leaf diseases by harnessing the power of an ensemble model in a sample dataset of tomato plants, containing images pertaining to nine different types of leaf diseases. This research introduces an ensemble model with an exponential moving average function with temporal constraints and an enhanced weighted gradient optimizer that is integrated into fine-tuned Visual Geometry Group-16 (VGG-16) and Neural Architecture Search Network (NASNet) mobile training methods for providing improved learning and classification accuracy. The dataset used for the research consists of 10,000 tomato leaf images categorized into nine classes for training and validating the model and an additional 1,000 images reserved for testing the model. The results have been analyzed thoroughly and benchmarked with existing performance metrics, thus proving that the proposed approach gives better performance in terms of accuracy, loss, precision, recall, receiver operating characteristic curve, and F1-score with values of 98.7%, 4%, 97.9%, 98.6%, 99.97%, and 98.7%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.