ArticleJournal of medical physics
A Practical Method for Slice Spacing Measurement Using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Computed Tomography Performance Phantom.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A method for distance accuracy evaluation on the reformatted oblique plane of CT images.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The slice spacing has a crucial role in the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) images in sagittal and coronal planes. However, there is no practical method for measuring the accuracy of the slice spacing. Purpose: This study proposes a novel method to automatically measure the slice spacing using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) CT performance phantom. Methods: The AAPM CT performance phantom module 610-04 was used to measure slice spacing. The process of slice spacing measurement involves a pair of axial images of the module containing ramp aluminum objects located at adjacent slice positions. The middle aluminum plate of each image was automatically segmented. Next, the two segmented images were combined to produce one image with two stair objects. The centroid coordinates of two stair objects were automatically determined. Subsequently, the distance between these two centroids was measured to directly indicate the slice spacing. For comparison, the slice spacing was calculated by accessing the slice position attributes from the DICOM header of both images. The proposed method was tested on phantom images with variations in slice spacing and field of view (FOV). Results: The results showed that the automatic measurement of slice spacing was quite accurate for all variations of slice spacing and FOV, with average differences of 9.0% and 9.3%, respectively. Conclusion: A new automated method for measuring the slice spacing using the AAPM CT phantom was successfully demonstrated and tested for variations of slice spacing and FOV. Slice spacing measurement may be considered an additional parameter to be checked in addition to other established parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.