Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38828003›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Quantifying public and private investment in European biopharmaceutical research and development.

Annabelle Fowler, Kathleen Grieve, Andreas Maos, Tim Wilsdon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Academic biomedical research is national defence.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annabelle FowlerLife Sciences, Charles River Associates, Boston, MA 02116, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0648-5398
Kathleen GrieveBrussels Policy Centre, MSD Europe Belgium SRL/BV, Brussels, 1040, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9103-9502
Andreas MaosLife Sciences, Charles River Associates, London, EC2M 7EA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3811-0553
Tim WilsdonLife Sciences, Charles River Associates, London, EC2M 7EA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-7953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust biopharmaceutical research and development (R&D) ecosystems require investment from both the public and private sectors. In Europe, there is an interest in growing biopharmaceutical R&D given its contribution to public health and the economy, which requires an understanding of current public and private investment. In addition, recent European draft legislation has focused on the public sector's contributions to biopharmaceutical R&D to inform pharmaceutical prices. However, there is little empirical evidence on the specifics of public and private funding for medicine R&D in Europe. This paper performs aggregative data collection to quantify 2019 investment in biopharmaceutical R&D by the public and private sectors in 6 countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, and the United Kingdom. We find that, across these countries, the private sector accounts for just under two-thirds of investment. We contrast results to those obtained using high-level R&D indicators from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and contextualize differences. We then provide 2013-2019 estimates for Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (countries with data to support such analysis), and show that total spending grew over those years, although proportions attributable to each sector remained stable. These findings should provide further evidence for debates on policies to effectively grow the biopharmaceutical R&D sector.

Indexed as

Europepharmaceutical innovationprivate sectorpublic sectorR&Dsynergies

Identifiers

PMID38828003
PMCPMC11141779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.