Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827979›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2024

A systematic review of the association between parent-child communication and adolescent mental health.

Holger Zapf, Johannes Boettcher, Yngvild Haukeland, Stian Orm, Sarah Coslar, Krister Fjermestad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. On the Measurement and Conceptualization of Parental Rules.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Longitudinal Effects of Parent-Adolescent Digital Communication on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holger ZapfDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2398-5220
Johannes BoettcherDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-2494
Yngvild HaukelandAdults for Children Foundation Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9759-6944
Stian OrmDivision Mental Health Care Innlandet Hospital Trust Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-8264
Sarah CoslarFaculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Krister FjermestadFrambu Resource Centre for Rare Disorders Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-0033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This systematic review addresses how adolescent-rated parent-child communication (PCC) quality is related to adolescent mental health. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and APA PsycInfo, including peer-reviewed quantitative studies examining associations between adolescent-rated dyadic PCC quality and general as well as specific measures of adolescent mental health. Qualitative and case studies were excluded, as were studies reporting only parent-rated communication quality or instruments assessing other constructs than dyadic PCC. We screened 5314 articles, of which 37 were included in the review. We assessed study quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: We synthesized the findings in a table and narratively, reporting the main outcomes organized according to mental health constructs. The included studies were mainly cross-sectional. The results showed that adolescent-rated PCC quality is negatively associated with mental health constructs, demonstrating small to large effects across different mental health constructs and populations. The associations were found for general mental health and specific domains, including depression, anxiety, psychosis, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and addictive internet use/gaming. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that PCC is a relevant variable to consider in assessing adolescent mental health and preventive efforts. Limitations include the exclusive focus on adolescent-reported PCC questionnaires since parent- and observer-rated instruments may lead to different results. Also, PCC is related to other constructs, such as dyadic relationships, that were not included in this review. We conclude that PCC is a relevant variable to consider in mental health research. Our findings suggest that PCC may be considered in mental health practice, both in terms of assessing its quality and potentially by tailoring interventions to enhance PCC. These may represent a mean to promote adolescent mental health.

Indexed as

child mental healthparent‐adolescent communicationparent‐adolescent relationshipreview

Identifiers

PMID38827979
PMCPMC11143954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.