Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827955›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

From Neglecting to Including Cultivar-Specific Per Se Temperature Responses: Extending the Concept of Thermal Time in Field Crops.

Lukas Roth, Martina Binder, Norbert Kirchgessner, Flavian Tschurr, Steven Yates, Andreas Hund, Lukas Kronenberg, Achim Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas RothETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-9535
Martina BinderETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Norbert KirchgessnerETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-6555
Flavian TschurrETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-1556
Steven YatesETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-0072
Andreas HundETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-1625
Lukas KronenbergETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-7676
Achim WalterETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-9643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting plant development, a longstanding goal in plant physiology, involves 2 interwoven components: continuous growth and the progression of growth stages (phenology). Current models for winter wheat and soybean assume species-level growth responses to temperature. We challenge this assumption, suggesting that cultivar-specific temperature responses substantially affect phenology. To investigate, we collected field-based growth and phenology data in winter wheat and soybean over multiple years. We used diverse models, from linear to neural networks, to assess growth responses to temperature at various trait and covariate levels. Cultivar-specific nonlinear models best explained phenology-related cultivar-environment interactions. With cultivar-specific models, additional relations to other stressors than temperature were found. The availability of the presented field phenotyping tools allows incorporating cultivar-specific temperature response functions in future plant physiology studies, which will deepen our understanding of key factors that influence plant development. Consequently, this work has implications for crop breeding and cultivation under adverse climatic conditions.

Identifiers

PMID38827955
PMCPMC11142864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.