ArticleClinical case reports2024
Case report of streptococcal infection as a potential precipitating factor in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa in pediatric patients.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: A case of cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa in a child following a streptococcal infection.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Case report of streptococcal infection as a potential precipitating factor in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa in pediatric patients.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key Clinical Message: This pediatric case report underscores the importance of maintaining a high clinical suspicion for polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) in patients presenting with atypical features, such as migratory arthritis and subcutaneous nodules. Importantly, it highlights the focus on the potential relationship between streptococcal infection and cutaneous PAN. Early recognition and prompt, aggressive treatment is critical, as PAN can be a life-threatening condition if left unmanaged. This case emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach to effectively identify and manage this rare vasculitis disorder in the pediatric population. Abstract: Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare and life-threatening vasculitis with diverse clinical presentations, posing a diagnostic challenge. Early recognition and prompt intervention are crucial to prevent organ damage. We present the case of an 8-year-old boy who exhibited atypical symptoms including migratory arthritis, myalgia, digital discoloration and ischemic changes, and subcutaneous nodules. Initial concerns for septic arthritis were ruled out. A comprehensive evaluation revealed elevated inflammatory markers and a confirmatory skin biopsy demonstrating active leukocytoclastic vasculitis, are highly suggestive of a diagnosis of PAN. Notably, elevated ASO titers suggested a possible concurrent streptococcal infection. The aggressive treatment approach with high-dose aspirin, steroids, methotrexate, and tocilizumab is justified given the severity of the patient's symptoms and the nature of the disease process. This case underscores the importance of considering PAN in the differential diagnosis for children presenting with atypical features. Early diagnosis and prompt intervention, including addressing potential infectious triggers, are crucial for optimal outcomes in pediatric PAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.