ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Esophageal cancer patient survival: A retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical outcomes and tolerability of adding radiotherapy to first-line chemoimmunotherapy for treating patients with metastatic or relapsed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The application effect of rubber band traction assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the pattern, tumor characteristics of esophageal cancer (EC) and survival of esophageal carcinoma patients presenting to upper GI Unit at Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of histologically confirmed EC patients from 2016 to 2021 at Upper GI Unit - Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi. Data were collected using a filled Proforma, medical records, pathology reports and surgical notes, and patients or their family members were contacted for informed consent. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 16.0. Time to event was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of the last follow-up or recorded death. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses, including Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, were employed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess independent predictors of survival. Results: Total 152 patients with a median age of 45 (range 80-15) years were enrolled in this study. Clinical stages-III, IV-A and IV-B were identified in 35.5% (n = 54), 23.7% (n = 36) and 34.2% (n = 52), respectively. Total of 62% (n=94) had died at median follow up of 9.56 months and three years overall survival rate was 10.0%. Univariate survival analysis revealed that patients with clinical stage-II (p-value 0.002) and patients treated with combined surgery plus chemo-radiotherapy (p-value 0.040) was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality among other stages and treatment modality groups. Conversely, patients having metastasis (p value <0.001) and those with vascular involvement >90 degrees (p value <0.001) showed worse survival outcomes. Conclusion: Our study reveals a three years survival rate of 10.0%, emphasizing the formidable challenge of advanced-stage malignancies. Clinical stage, vascular involvement, and metastasis emerged as significant predictors of mortality. Moreover, integrating surgery with chemo-radiotherapy significantly improved three years survival (36.8% vs. 14.2%). Despite single-center limitations, our findings provide crucial regional insights into esophageal carcinoma outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.