ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Outcome of the incarcerated abdominal wall hernias managed by open and laparoscopic approaches.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EHS Guidelines on the Management of Primary Ventral and Incisional Hernias Under Emergency Conditions.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: Laparoscopic surgery is generally considered as better than open surgery in terms of less complications, minimal hospital stays and quick healing of the wounds. Our objective was to compare the immediate and early outcome of the different incarcerated hernias of anterior abdominal wall operated on as emergency cases by open and laparoscopic approach. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study which was conducted at two hospitals of AlAhsa city of the Eastern region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from July, 2017 to June, 2022. The data were retrieved from the medical records of the hospitals. All male and female patients having different types of incarcerated hernias of anterior abdominal wall presenting to the emergency room were included in the study. The patients were divided in two groups; those who were operated on by open approach (Group-I) and those who were operated on by laparoscopic approach (Group-II). Results: Out of total 70 male and female patients, 42 were in Group-I and 28 in Group-II. The variety of the incarcerated hernias in both groups overall was para-umbilical 26(37.14%), incisional 18(25.71%), inguinal (right & left) 17(24.28%) and epigastric 9(12.86%). The mean operative time taken by Group I and II was 126.07 (±9.728) and 98.57 (±10.079) minutes respectively with a difference of 27.50 minutes (p=0.807). The mean hospital stay of the patients in Group I and II was 1.36(±0.719) and 1.57(±0.997) days respectively (p=0.482). The post-operative complications rate in Group-I was 6(14.28%) and in Group-II, 6(21.43%) (p=0.658). Overall, 12(17.14%) patients developed the complications in both groups. When the number of the complications is compared, it shows that there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.583). Conclusion: Laparoscopic approach is not superior to the open approach in the terms of the immediate and early outcome/complications of the incarcerated hernias of the anterior abdominal wall operated as emergency cases in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.