ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Can processed images be used to determine the modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency?
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The modulation transfer function (MTF) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of x-ray detectors are key Fourier metrics of performance, valid only for linear and shift-invariant (LSI) systems and generally measured following IEC guidelines requiring the use of raw (unprocessed) image data. However, many detectors incorporate processing in the imaging chain that is difficult or impossible to disable, raising questions about the practical relevance of MTF and DQE testing. We investigate the impact of convolution-based embedded processing on MTF and DQE measurements. Approach: We use an impulse-sampled notation, consistent with a cascaded-systems analysis in spatial and spatial-frequency domains to determine the impact of discrete convolution (DC) on measured MTF and DQE following IEC guidelines. Results: We show that digital systems remain LSI if we acknowledge both image pixel values and convolution kernels represent scaled Dirac Conclusions: It is concluded that: (i) the MTF of DC is always an unbounded cosine series; (ii) the slanted-edge method yields the true presampling MTF, even when using processed images, with processing appearing as an analytic filter with cosine-series MTF applied to raw presampling image data; (iii) the DQE is unaffected by discrete-convolution-based processing with a possible exception near zero-points in the presampling MTF; and (iv) the FT of the impulse-sampled notation is equivalent to the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.