Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827766›Full record

ReviewClinics in orthopedic surgery2024

Application of ChatGPT for Orthopedic Surgeries and Patient Care.

Vivek Kumar Morya, Ho-Won Lee, Hamzah Shahid, Anuja Gajanan Magar, Ju-Hyung Lee, Jae-Hyung Kim, Lang Jun, Kyu-Cheol Noh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is ChatGPT a Reliable Auxiliary Tool in Basic Life Support Training and Education? A Cross-sectional Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vivek Kumar MoryaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-4883
Ho-Won LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-6729
Hamzah ShahidDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-1722
Anuja Gajanan MagarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-2917
Ju-Hyung LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-5500
Jae-Hyung KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-4343
Lang JunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4962-0270
Kyu-Cheol NohDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-2977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed various aspects of life, and the launch of the chatbot "ChatGPT" by OpenAI in November 2022 has garnered significant attention and user appreciation. ChatGPT utilizes natural language processing based on a "generative pre-trained transfer" (GPT) model, specifically the transformer architecture, to generate human-like responses to a wide range of questions and topics. Equipped with approximately 57 billion words and 175 billion parameters from online data, ChatGPT has potential applications in medicine and orthopedics. One of its key strengths is its personalized, easy-to-understand, and adaptive response, which allows it to learn continuously through user interaction. This article discusses how AI, especially ChatGPT, presents numerous opportunities in orthopedics, ranging from preoperative planning and surgical techniques to patient education and medical support. Although ChatGPT's user-friendly responses and adaptive capabilities are laudable, its limitations, including biased responses and ethical concerns, necessitate its cautious and responsible use. Surgeons and healthcare providers should leverage the strengths of the ChatGPT while recognizing its current limitations and verifying critical information through independent research and expert opinions. As AI technology continues to evolve, ChatGPT may become a valuable tool in orthopedic education and patient care, leading to improved outcomes and efficiency in healthcare delivery. The integration of AI into orthopedics offers substantial benefits but requires careful consideration and continuous improvement.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOrthopedic ProceduresHumansNatural Language ProcessingPatient CareChatGPTOrthopedicsOrthopedic surgeryPatient careSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID38827766
PMCPMC11130626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.