Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827567›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024

AI-algorithm training and validation for identification of endometrial CD138+ cells in infertility-associated conditions; polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

Seungbaek Lee, Riikka K Arffman, Elina K Komsi, Outi Lindgren, Janette A Kemppainen, Hanna Metsola, Henna-Riikka Rossi, Anne Ahtikoski, Keiu Kask, Merli Saare and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Role of the Endometrium in Implantation: A Modern View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seungbaek LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Riikka K ArffmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Elina K KomsiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Outi LindgrenDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Janette A KemppainenDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Hanna MetsolaDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Henna-Riikka RossiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu 90220, Finland.
Anne AhtikoskiDepartment of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku 20521, Finland.
Keiu KaskDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu 50406, Estonia.
Merli SaareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu 50406, Estonia.
Andres SalumetsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu 50406, Estonia.
Terhi T PiltonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu 90220, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometrial CD138+ plasma cells serve as a diagnostic biomarker for endometrial inflammation, and their elevated occurrence correlates positively with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Infertility-related conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are closely associated with systemic and local chronic inflammatory status, wherein endometrial CD138+ plasma cell accumulation could also contribute to endometrial pathology. Current methods for quantifying CD138+ cells typically involve laborious and time-consuming microscopic assessments of only a few random areas from a slide. These methods have limitations in accurately representing the entire slide and are susceptible to significant biases arising from intra- and interobserver variations. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) for CD138+ cell identification could enhance the accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of analysis. Methods: Here, an AI algorithm was developed to identify CD138+ plasma cells within endometrial tissue. The AI model comprised two layers of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN1 was trained to segment epithelium and stroma across 28,363 mm Results: The AI algorithm consistently and reliably distinguished CD138- and CD138+ cells, with total error rates of 6.32% and 3.23%, respectively. During the training validation, there was a complete agreement between the decisions made by the pathologists and the AI algorithm, while the performance validation demonstrated excellent accuracy between the AI and human evaluation methods (intraclass correlation; 0.76, 95% confidence intervals; 0.36-0.93, Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the potential and accuracy of the AI algorithm in detecting endometrial CD138+ plasma cells, offering distinct advantages over manual inspection, such as rapid analysis of whole slide images, reduction of intra- and interobserver variations, sparing the valuable time of trained specialists, and consistent productivity. This supports the application of AI technology to help clinical decision-making, for example, in understanding endometrial cycle phase-related dynamics, as well as different reproductive disorders.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCD138Chronic endometritisComputational histologyPolycystic ovary syndromeRecurrent implantation failure

Identifiers

PMID38827567
PMCPMC11140811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.