Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827364›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2024

No adults allowed: Adolescents and Medical Decision Making.

Elisheva T A Nemetz, Ryan S Huang, Sunit Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisheva T A NemetzTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-6392
Ryan S HuangTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-5376
Sunit DasDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-4168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of the literature focused on whether consent should be extended to the adolescent population arises from themes adapted from American tort law. In contrast to the USA, Ontario does not delineate an age of consent for medical treatment and relying on American guidelines to guide practice in Ontario is problematic. While the literature is saturated with discussions for and against seeking adolescent consent, there are currently no bioethical guidelines on adolescent consent in the province of Ontario. This paper explores adolescent refusal of care and adolescent request for care in opposition to parental wishes. The paper seeks to answer the following questions: What is the difference between an adolescent and an adult in medical decision-making? What are the barriers to seeking adolescent consent? And, can the neurobiological argument be an accurate guide for obtaining adolescent consent?

Indexed as

AdolescenceBarriersCapacityConsentEthics

Identifiers

PMID38827364
PMCPMC11141595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.