ArticleIranian journal of biotechnology2024
Time and Cost-Effective Genome Editing Protocol for Simultaneous Caspase 8 Associated Protein 2 Gene Knock in/out in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Using CRISPR-Cas9 System.
Article in Iranian journal of biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Engineering for Increasing Production of Recombinant Proteins in Mammalian Cells.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- From Cell Clones to Recombinant Protein Product Heterogeneity in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CHO cells are preferred for producing biopharmaceuticals, and genome editing technologies offer opportunities to enhance recombinant protein production. Targeting apoptosis-related genes, such as Caspases 8-Associated Protein 2 (CASP8AP2), improves CHO cell viability and productivity. Integrating robust strategies with the CRISPR-Cas9 system enables its application in CHO cell engineering. Objectives: This study was performed to develop a cost-effective protocol using the CRISPR-Cas9 system combined with the HITI strategy for simultaneous CASP8AP2 gene deletion/insertion in CHO cells and to assess its impact on cell viability and protein expression. Materials and Methods: We developed an efficient protocol for CHO cell engineering by combining CRISPR/Cas9 with the HITI strategy. Two distinct sgRNA sequences were designed to target the 3' UTR region of the CASP8AP2 gene using CHOPCHOP software. The gRNAs were cloned into PX459 and PX460-1 vectors and transfected into CHO cells using the cost-effective PEI reagent. A manual selection system was employed to streamline the process of single-cell cloning. MTT assays assessed gene silencing and cell viability at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Flow cytometry evaluated protein expression in CASP8AP2-silenced CHO cells. Results: The study confirmed the robustness of combining CRISPR-Cas9 with the HITI strategy, achieving a high 60% efficiency in generating knockout clones. PEI transfection successfully delivered the constructs to nearly 65% of the clones, with the majority being homozygous. The protocol proved feasible for resource-limited labs, requiring only an inverted fluorescent microscope. CASP8AP2 knockout (CHO-KO) cells exhibited significantly extended cell viability compared to CHO-K1 cells when treated with NaBu, with IC50 values of 7.28 mM and 14.25 mM at 48 hours, respectively (P-value 24 hours ≤ 0.0001, 48 hours ≤ 0.0001, P-value 72 hours = 0.0007). CHO CASP8AP2-silenced cells showed a 1.3-fold increase in JRed expression compared to native cells. Conclusions: CRISPR-Cas9 and HITI strategy was used to efficiently engineer CHO cells for simultaneous CASP8AP2 gene deletion/insertion, which improved cell viability and protein expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.