Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827316›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Linking patient-reported oral and general health-related quality of life.

Danna R Paulson, Phonsuda Chanthavisouk, Mike T John, Leah Feuerstahler, Xing Chen, Aparna Ingleshwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danna R PaulsonDepartment of Primary Dental Care, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-5608
Phonsuda ChanthavisoukDepartment of Primary Dental Care, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Mike T JohnDepartment of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Leah FeuerstahlerDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-8519
Xing ChenDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, United States.
Aparna IngleshwarDepartment of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3098-1578

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UL1TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The relationship between oral and overall health is of interest to health care professionals and patients alike. This study investigated the correlation between oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a general adult population. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of adult participants (N = 607) attending the 2022 Minnesota County and State fairs in USA, the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) assessed OHRQoL, and the 10-item PROMIS v.1.2 Global Health Instrument assessed HRQoL. Spearman and Pearson correlations were used to summarize the bivariable relationship between OHRQoL and HRQoL (both physical and mental health dimensions). A structural equation model determined OHRQoL-HRQoL correlations (r). Correlations' magnitude was interpreted according to Cohen's guidelines (r = 0.10, 0.30, and 0.50 to demarcate "small," "medium," and "large" effects, respectively). Results: OHRQoL and HRQoL correlated with r = 0.52 (95% confidence interval, CI: [0.50-0.55]), indicating that the two constructs shared 27% of their information. According to Cohen, this was a "large" effect. OHRQoL, and the physical and mental HRQoL dimensions correlated with r = 0.55 (95% CI: [0.50-0.59]) and r = 0.43 (95% CI: [0.40-0.46]), respectively, indicating a "large" and a "medium" effect. OHRQoL and HRQoL were substantially correlated in an adult population. Conclusion: Using OHIP-5 to assess their dental patients' oral health impact allows dental professionals to gain insights into patients' overall health-related wellbeing.

Indexed as

Oral HealthQuality of LifeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAssociationCorrelationHealth-related quality of lifeOHIP-5Oral health impact profileOral health-related quality of lifePROMISQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID38827316
PMCPMC11141547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.