ArticlePeerJ2024
Investigating molecular markers linked to acute myocardial infarction and cuproptosis: bioinformatics analysis and validation in the AMI mice model.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Copper dyshomeostasis and cardiovascular disease: Molecular mechanisms and new strategies for targeted intervention with cuproptosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis in myocardial infarction: molecular mechanisms, treatment strategies and potential therapeutic targets.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuproptosis-related key genes play a significant role in the pathological processes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, a complete understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind this participation remains elusive. This study was designed to identify genes and immune cells critical to AMI pathogenesis. Based on the GSE48060 dataset (31 AMI patients and 21 healthy persons, GPL570-55999), we identified genes associated with dysregulated cuproptosis and the activation of immune responses between normal subjects and patients with a first myocardial attack. Two molecular clusters associated with cuproptosis were defined in patients with AMI. Immune infiltration analysis showed that there was significant immunity heterogeneity among different clusters. Multiple immune responses were closely associated with Cluster2-specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The generalized linear model machine model presented the best discriminative performance with relatively lower residual and root mean square error, and a higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.870). A final two-gene-based generalized linear model was constructed, exhibiting satisfactory performance in two external validation datasets (AUC = 0.719, GSE66360 and AUC = 0.856, GSE123342). Column graph, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses also proved the accuracy of AMI prediction. We also constructed a mouse C57BL/6 model of AMI (3 h, 48 h, and 1 week) and used qRT-PCR and immunofluorescence to detect the expression changes of CBLB and ZNF302. In this study, we present a systematic analysis of the complex relationship between cuproptosis and a first AMI attack, and provide new insights into the diagnosis and treatment of AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.