Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827246›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

An immersive virtual reality communication skills training for dietitians: A feasibility study.

Ivan Moser, Victoria Mirata, Per Bergamin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan MoserInstitute for Research in Open, Distance, and eLearning, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Schinerstrasse 18, CH-3900 Brig, Switzerland.
Victoria MirataInstitute for Research in Open, Distance, and eLearning, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Schinerstrasse 18, CH-3900 Brig, Switzerland.
Per BergaminInstitute for Research in Open, Distance, and eLearning, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, Schinerstrasse 18, CH-3900 Brig, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The training of dietitians emphasizes the development of strong communication skills. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has been successfully employed for various healthcare scenarios; however, it is yet understudied in dietetics education. Therefore, we conducted a feasibility study to investigate the usefulness of IVR for the purpose of communication skills training. Methods: We designed a multi-user virtual hospital environment that enabled the training of professional conversations between dietitians and patients. Divided into groups of three, 30 dietetics students participated in a role-play task. Taking a qualitative approach to inquiry, we evaluated how participants assessed the benefits and limitations of the IVR training. Results: Participants appreciated the authenticity of the training environment and mentioned various advantages of IVR (e.g., sense of privacy, better focus on conversation) over traditional modes of instruction. On the other side, participants frequently mentioned that the lack of avatars' facial expressions might present an obstacle for effective communication skills training. Conclusion: IVR enables authentic communication skills trainings for dietitians. Special consideration should be given to providing ample social cues during training. Innovation: The study demonstrates that the promising results from other healthcare professions regarding the usefulness of IVR training also apply to dietetics.

Indexed as

Communication skills trainingDieteticsSituated learningUsabilityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38827246
PMCPMC11140775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.