ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Growth and gut comfort of healthy term infants exclusively fed with a partially hydrolysed protein-based infant formula: a randomized controlled double-blind trial.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05757323 (A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Parallel Group Trial to Study the Effects of an Infant Formula Containing Partially Hydrolysed Proteins on Growth and Tolerance in Healthy Term Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Parallel Group Trial to Study the Effects of an Infant Formula Containing Partially Hydrolysed Proteins on Growth and Tolerance in Healthy Term Infants
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The Penguin Study: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Equivalence Trial on the Safety and Suitability of an Infant Formula with Partially Hydrolysed 100% Whey Protein.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing nutritional strategies in term NEC and perforation infants after intestinal operation: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate growth and gut comfort of healthy infants fed with a partially hydrolysed cow's milk protein-based infant formula (pHF) compared to a standard intact cow's milk protein-based formula (IPF). Methods: A double-blind, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Healthy full-term, exclusively formula-fed infants ( Results: Overall, 288 infants completed the study (pHF group: 138, IPF group: 150). No differences were observed between the two groups in weight gain (g/d) during the three-months intervention [ Conclusions: The study demonstrates that the consumption of pHF results in adequate infant growth, equivalent to that of infants consuming IPF. Furthermore, the overall gut comfort was comparable between the two groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that the pHF is safe for and well tolerated by healthy infants. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05757323?id=NCT05757323&rank=1, identifier (NCT05757323).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.