ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Counterfactual Sepsis Outcome Prediction Under Dynamic and Time-Varying Treatment Regimes.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A generalist precision medication framework using temporal causal inference based on treatment-free physiological profiles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Early Prediction of Adverse Events in Intensive Care Units Using Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- G-Transformer: Counterfactual Outcome Prediction under Dynamic and Time-varying Treatment Regimes.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's normal response to an infection is out of balance. A key part of managing sepsis involves the administration of intravenous fluids and vasopressors. In this work, we explore the application of G-Net, a deep sequential modeling framework for g-computation, to predict outcomes under counterfactual fluid treatment strategies in a real-world cohort of sepsis patients. Utilizing observational data collected from the intensive care unit (ICU), we evaluate the performance of multiple deep learning implementations of G-Net and compare their predictive performance with linear models in forecasting patient outcomes and trajectories over time under the observational treatment regime. We then demonstrate that G-Net can generate counterfactual prediction of covariate trajectories that align with clinical expectations across various fluid limiting regimes. Our study demonstrates the potential clinical utility of G-Net in predicting counterfactual treatment outcomes, aiding clinicians in informed decision-making for sepsis patients in the ICU.
Identifiers
38827103PMC11141800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.