ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Exploring Large Language Models for Acronym, Symbol Sense Disambiguation, and Semantic Similarity and Relatedness Assessment.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical insights: A comprehensive review of language models in medicine.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acronyms, abbreviations, and symbols play a significant role in clinical notes. Acronym and symbol sense disambiguation are crucial natural language processing (NLP) tasks that ensure the clarity and consistency of clinical notes and downstream NLP processing. Previous studies using traditional machine learning methods have been relatively successful in tackling this issue. In our research, we conducted an evaluation of large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT 3.5 and 4, as well as other open LLMs, and BERT-based models, across three NLP tasks: acronym and symbol sense disambiguation, semantic similarity, and relatedness. Our findings emphasize ChatGPT's remarkable ability to distinguish between senses with minimal or zero-shot training. Additionally, open source LLM Mixtrial-8x7B exhibited high accuracy for acronyms with fewer senses, and moderate accuracy for symbol sense accuracy. BERT-based models outperformed previous machine learning approaches, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of over 95%, showcasing their effectiveness in addressing the challenge of acronym and symbol sense disambiguation. Furthermore, ChatGPT exhibited a strong correlation, surpassing 70%, with human gold standards when evaluating similarity and relatedness.
Identifiers
38827102PMC11141821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.