Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827102›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024

Exploring Large Language Models for Acronym, Symbol Sense Disambiguation, and Semantic Similarity and Relatedness Assessment.

Ying Liu, Genevieve B Melton, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying LiuUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.
Genevieve B MeltonUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.
Rui ZhangUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acronyms, abbreviations, and symbols play a significant role in clinical notes. Acronym and symbol sense disambiguation are crucial natural language processing (NLP) tasks that ensure the clarity and consistency of clinical notes and downstream NLP processing. Previous studies using traditional machine learning methods have been relatively successful in tackling this issue. In our research, we conducted an evaluation of large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT 3.5 and 4, as well as other open LLMs, and BERT-based models, across three NLP tasks: acronym and symbol sense disambiguation, semantic similarity, and relatedness. Our findings emphasize ChatGPT's remarkable ability to distinguish between senses with minimal or zero-shot training. Additionally, open source LLM Mixtrial-8x7B exhibited high accuracy for acronyms with fewer senses, and moderate accuracy for symbol sense accuracy. BERT-based models outperformed previous machine learning approaches, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of over 95%, showcasing their effectiveness in addressing the challenge of acronym and symbol sense disambiguation. Furthermore, ChatGPT exhibited a strong correlation, surpassing 70%, with human gold standards when evaluating similarity and relatedness.

Identifiers

PMID38827102
PMCPMC11141821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.