ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
A Study of Biomedical Relation Extraction Using GPT Models.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-tuned GPT-based foundation models effectively reconstruct bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks from literature.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Towards scalable and cross-lingual specialist language models for oncology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reduction of supervision for biomedical knowledge discovery.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Large Language Models and Genomics for Summarizing the Role of microRNA in Regulating mRNA Expression.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Crowdsourcing-Based Knowledge Graph Construction for Drug Side Effects Using Large Language Models with an Application on Semaglutide.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relation Extraction (RE) is a natural language processing (NLP) task for extracting semantic relations between biomedical entities. Recent developments in pre-trained large language models (LLM) motivated NLP researchers to use them for various NLP tasks. We investigated GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 on extracting the relations from three standard datasets, EU-ADR, Gene Associations Database (GAD), and ChemProt. Unlike the existing approaches using datasets with masked entities, we used three versions for each dataset for our experiment: a version with masked entities, a second version with the original entities (unmasked), and a third version with abbreviations replaced with the original terms. We developed the prompts for various versions and used the chat completion model from GPT API. Our approach achieved a F1-score of 0.498 to 0.809 for GPT-3.5-turbo, and a highest F1-score of 0.84 for GPT-4. For certain experiments, the performance of GPT, BioBERT, and PubMedBERT are almost the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38827097PMC11141827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.